The distribution network operators the banquet 2006 are financed by the network charges. Each ultim

Blog Editorial Blackout Grid Affairs trading power blog data mart local and municipal lobby Pin dinosaur Think Tank Tools Energiecheck mix Navigator press review feed Photovoltaics Wind Power Wind / Sun - meet demand green electricity Index References
"Struggle for power" was the headline Prof. Dr. Claudia kemfert her book about myths, power and monopolies around the current turnaround the banquet 2006 in Germany. Will be wearing this fight in many places, but rarely so openly, as in the question of concessions for distribution. On the one side are the municipalities, watch their elected representatives on the local authority, should insist on the power lines and substations. On the other side is the current customer who expects the banquet 2006 the selection of a distribution the banquet 2006 system operator by payment of its concession fee, which can ensure security of supply. In between is the distribution network operator itself, which receives secure revenue for years in a regional monopoly. Potential for conflict, which is examined in detail in a study by the Wuppertal Institute the banquet 2006 for Climate, Environment and Energy. 53 pages, which show that the struggle for power by all means is played on the field of battle of the networks.
Since December 2012, blog on. Stromhaltig repeatedly reported by the re-allocation of the power grid concession in Elsenztal. In the current message in the local press, the possibility of their own network society is no longer called owned by the municipalities. Thus, the method of Konze Sion award differs significantly in the urgency of the Berlin referendum, in which the slogan was "electricity networks in civil Hand" was coined. In Elsenztal the discussion is free of emotions. Currently a list of criteria for the 5 provider was created. Criteria to move to the 1 of the Energy Act. The defined weighting is now to be decided by the municipal councils of the 9 municipalities.
100% satisfaction is made up of ... 30% 25% Efficient network security, cost-effective and consumer-friendly supply 20% conditions of the concession contract 15% Municipal Participation (Energy Advisory Board) 10% environmental
Last year was the mayor of Wall, John Ehret, the banquet 2006 said that the legal security of the concession actually the highest priority for the communities the banquet 2006 own. A consulting firm was commissioned specifically for this challenge.
The Federal Cartel Office currently running over 1,200 procedures. Of these numerous cases relate to complaints from Altkonzessionären against municipalities who have awarded the concession to own municipal utilities or new concessionaires (frequent accusation: abuse of a dominant position). (Source: Study of the Wuppertal Institute for Climate, Environment and Energy) distribution as part of the local authority
In many places, the distribution networks are operated by the network companies Stadtwerke. But the concession is limited in time, ie after they too have to face the competition. In the 9 municipalities in the heart of the Rhine-Neckar the banquet 2006 triangle, there have been no public utility. The current concessionaire is the Syna, network subsidiary Süwag (RWE group). Nationwide, the network is (formerly EnBW) connected to the control area of the Übetragungsnetzbetreibers EnBW.
Regardless of the operators with the municipalities, the banquet 2006 the concession fee. The distribution the banquet 2006 system operator receives the network charges, which must be published on the part of providers (Example: network charges EnBW networks). Each customer's basic or replacement supply is automatically a customer of the electricity provider by the concession holder. In addition - and relevant to the development of heating by heat pumps - are these fares usually only be obtained from the primary care. Which provider gets the contract has thus for the normal household tariff customers once no effect, but for the heat tariff customers. The reason the banquet 2006 why these clients can use to another provider rarely, is the usual in heat tariffs load shedding, which is initiated by ripple the banquet 2006 control technology. For triggering the appropriate the banquet 2006 signal access to the distribution network is required, which does not have other providers.
The distribution network operators the banquet 2006 are financed by the network charges. Each ultimate purchaser, regardless of his chosen tariff, committed to these price per kilo-watt-hour loss to be paid. For the Syna these appear in the price sheet 5 and amount to 29.20 / year and 4.84 cents per kilowatt-hour. With a current average price of 25 cents currently hence the cost for the end user account for around 20% of the electricity bill. Municipalities should consider these costs in the award, because they vary somewhat between the different network operators. the banquet 2006 Fear for stability
The